Copilot at Work: How Generative AI is Quietly Rewriting Job Descriptions
A mechanism-first reading of Microsoft’s Copilot usage study, showing how generative AI maps onto real work activities without pretending that applicability equals automation.
A mechanism-first reading of Microsoft’s Copilot usage study, showing how generative AI maps onto real work activities without pretending that applicability equals automation.
A field guide to why LLM-generated survey responses are fragile, biased, and useful only when treated as instruments to validate rather than respondents to trust.
A mechanism-first reading of why alignment for user satisfaction can make language models more persuasive while making them less committed to truth.
A practical reading of why AI-assisted monitoring tools need feedback infrastructure, not just better classifiers.
A mechanism-first reading of the Jolting Technologies Hypothesis: useful as an early-warning framework, not yet proof that AI capability curves are already superexponential.
Michael I. Jordan’s paper argues that AI systems should be designed less like isolated minds and more like markets of people, data, incentives, uncertainty, and local knowledge.
A mechanism-first look at why preference tuning can extract strong gains from weak model pairs, and where the shortcut stops working.
A case-first analysis of why production LLM prompts need migration discipline, not just better wording, when model versions change.
A comparison-based read of how fine-tuned open models can rival proprietary LLMs for narrow educational feedback tasks—without pretending they have conquered tutoring.
CAVGAN shows that LLM jailbreaks and defenses may be two sides of the same hidden-representation boundary problem.