Bias, Baked In: Why Pretraining, Not Fine-Tuning, Shapes LLM Behavior
A causal study suggests that LLM cognitive biases are shaped mainly by pretraining, while fine-tuning mostly modulates how those biases appear.
A causal study suggests that LLM cognitive biases are shaped mainly by pretraining, while fine-tuning mostly modulates how those biases appear.
DeMul shows how vision-language models can borrow GPT semantics without depending on noisy generated descriptions.
A mechanism-first look at how literature mining and matrix factorisation can rank hidden material-property links without pretending to replace experimental validation.
STELLA shows how biomedical AI agents may become more useful by evolving their reasoning workflows and toolsets, not merely by adding a larger language model.
A mechanism-first reading of how set-level entropy turns noisy memorization anecdotes into a practical audit signal for LLM training data.
SymbolicThought shows why reliable relationship extraction needs LLMs, symbolic rules, evidence retrieval, and human verification working as one system.
A practical map of what causal analysts can and cannot claim when the full causal graph is unknown.
ResQuNNs show that deeper quanvolutional neural networks fail less from lack of quantum expressivity than from broken gradient access after measurement and re-encoding.
A mechanism-first reading of why diminishing returns may erode frontier-model compute moats faster than most AI strategy decks admit.
GRAFT shows that better document translation may come less from longer context windows than from explicit discourse structure, dependency graphs, and selective memory.