Cognaptus Insights

What will the future AI agent look like—a collection of specialized tools or a Swiss army knife of intelligence? As researchers and builders edge closer to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), the design and structure of multi-domain agents becomes both a technical and economic question. Recent proposals like NGENT1 highlight a clear vision: agents that can simultaneously perceive, plan, act, and learn across text, vision, robotics, emotion, and decision-making. But is this convergence inevitable—or even desirable? ...

The Chain-of-Thought (CoT) paradigm has become a cornerstone in improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). But as CoT matures, one question looms larger: Does every problem really need an elaborate chain? In this article, we dive into a new method called AdaR1, which rethinks the CoT strategy by asking not only how to reason—but how much. ...

In the age of Transformers and neural nets that write poetry, it’s tempting to assume deep learning dominates every corner of AI. But in quantitative investing, the roots tell a different story. A recent paper—QuantBench: Benchmarking AI Methods for Quantitative Investment1—delivers a grounded reminder: tree-based models still outperform deep learning (DL) methods across key financial prediction tasks. ...

As artificial intelligence surges toward superhuman capabilities, one truth becomes unavoidable: the strength of our oversight must grow just as fast as the intelligence of the systems we deploy. Simply hoping that “better AI will supervise even better AI” is not a strategy — it’s wishful thinking. Recent research from MIT and collaborators proposes a bold new way to think about this challenge: Nested Scalable Oversight (NSO) — a method to recursively layer weaker systems to oversee stronger ones1. One of the key contributors, Max Tegmark, is a physicist and cosmologist at MIT renowned for his work on AI safety, the mathematical structure of reality, and existential risk analysis. Tegmark is also the founder of the Future of Life Institute, an organization dedicated to mitigating risks from transformative technologies. ...

Training AI agents to navigate complex environments has always faced a fundamental bottleneck: the overwhelming number of possible actions. Traditional reinforcement learning (RL) techniques often suffer from inefficient exploration, especially in sparse-reward or high-dimensional settings. Recent research offers a promising breakthrough. By leveraging Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and structured generation pipelines, agents can now automatically discover affordances—context-specific action possibilities—without exhaustive trial-and-error. This new paradigm enables AI to focus only on relevant actions, dramatically improving sample efficiency and learning speed. ...

Logos, Metron, and Kratos: Forging the Future of Conversational Agents Conversational agents are evolving beyond their traditional roles as scripted dialogue handlers. They are poised to become dynamic participants in human workflows, capable not only of responding but of reasoning, monitoring, and exercising control. This transformation demands a profound rethinking of the design principles behind AI agents. In this Cognaptus Insights article, we explore a new conceptual architecture for next-generation Conversational Agents inspired by ancient Greek notions of rationality, measurement, and governance. Building on recent academic advances, we propose that agents must master three fundamental dimensions: Logos (Reasoning), Metron (Monitoring), and Kratos (Control). These pillars, grounded in both cognitive science and agent-based modeling traditions, provide a robust foundation for agents capable of integrating deeply with human activities. ...

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transitioned from a promising concept to a critical driver of business scalability, particularly within complex industries like insurance. Large Language Models (LLMs) now automate knowledge-intensive processes, transforming workflows previously constrained by manual capacity. However, effective AI-driven automation involves more than technical deployment—it demands nuanced strategic adjustments, comprehensive understanding of workflow dynamics, and meticulous validation. In this detailed case study, Cognaptus Insights examines how If P&C Insurance, a leading insurer operating across the Nordic and Baltic regions, leveraged AI-driven Business Process Automation. The study employs Object-Centric Process Mining (OCPM) as an analytical lens, providing a robust framework for evaluating impacts, uncovering subtle workflow interactions, and formulating evidence-based best practices.1 ...

Humans famously “never forget” like elephants—or at least that’s how the saying goes. Yet, traditional conversational AI still struggles to efficiently manage very long conversations. Even with extended context windows up to 2 million tokens, current AI models face challenges in effectively understanding and recalling long-term context. Enter a new AI memory architecture inspired by the human hippocampus: one that promises to transform conversational agents from forgetful assistants into attentive conversationalists capable of months-long discussions without missing a beat. ...

Generative AI is often praised for its creativity—composing symphonies, painting surreal scenes, or offering quirky new business ideas. But in some contexts, especially research and data processing, consistency and accuracy are far more valuable than imagination. A recent exploratory study by Utrecht University demonstrates exactly where Large Language Models (LLMs) like Claude 3 Opus shine—not as muses, but as meticulous clerks. When AI Becomes the Analyst The research project explores three different use cases in which generative AI was employed to perform highly structured research data tasks: ...

“You expect AI to be dumber than humans. But when it’s smarter and still fails, that’s when it hurts.” Earlier this month, Cursor AI’s chatbot “Sam” fabricated a nonexistent refund policy, confidently explaining to users why it was entitled to keep their subscription money—even when those users were eligible for a refund1. The backlash was immediate. Users lost trust. Some cancelled their subscriptions entirely. ...