Automation

In the AI race to make large language models both factual and reasoned, two camps have emerged: one focused on retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to fight hallucination, the other on long-chain reasoning to mimic logic. But neither wins alone. This week’s survey by Li et al. (2025), Towards Agentic RAG with Deep Reasoning, delivers the most comprehensive synthesis yet of the field’s convergence point: synergized RAG–Reasoning. It’s no longer a question of whether retrieval helps generation or reasoning helps retrieval—but how tightly the two can co-evolve, often under the coordination of autonomous agents. ...

If you’ve looked at any leaderboard lately—from SWE-Bench to WebArena—you’ve probably seen impressive numbers. But how many of those reflect real capabilities of AI agents? This paper by Zhu et al. makes a bold claim: agentic benchmarks are often broken, and the way we evaluate AI agents is riddled with systemic flaws. Their response is refreshingly practical: a 33-point diagnostic called the Agentic Benchmark Checklist (ABC), designed not just to critique, but to fix the evaluation process. It’s a must-read not only for benchmark creators, but for any team serious about deploying or comparing AI agents in real-world tasks. ...

Enterprise data workflows have long been a patchwork of scripts, schedulers, human-in-the-loop dashboards, and brittle integrations. Enter the “Data Agent”: an AI-native abstraction designed not just to automate, but to reason over, adapt to, and orchestrate complex Data+AI ecosystems. In their paper, “Data Agent: A Holistic Architecture for Orchestrating Data+AI Ecosystems”, Zhaoyan Sun et al. from Tsinghua University propose a new agentic blueprint for data orchestration—one that moves far beyond traditional ETL. ...

When it comes to automating customer service, generative AI walks a tightrope: it can understand free-form text better than any tool before it—but with a dangerous twist. Sometimes, it just makes things up. These hallucinations, already infamous in legal and healthcare settings, can turn minor misunderstandings into costly liabilities. But what if instead of trusting one all-powerful AI model, we take a lesson from bees? A recent paper by Amer & Amer proposes just that: a multi-agent system inspired by collective intelligence in nature, combining LLMs, regex parsing, fuzzy logic, and tool-based validators to build a hallucination-resilient automation pipeline. Their case study—processing prescription renewal SMS requests—may seem narrow, but its implications are profound for any business relying on LLMs for critical operations. ...

In the symphony of innovation, TRIZ has long served as the structured score guiding engineers toward inventive breakthroughs. But what happens when you give the orchestra to a team of AI agents? Enter TRIZ Agents, a bold exploration of how large language model (LLM) agents—armed with tools, prompts, and persona-based roles—can orchestrate a complete innovation cycle using the TRIZ methodology. Cracking the Code of Creativity TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving), derived from the study of thousands of patents, offers a time-tested approach to resolving contradictions in engineering design. It formalizes the innovation process through tools like the 40 Inventive Principles and the Contradiction Matrix. However, its structured elegance demands deep domain expertise—something often scarce outside elite R&D centers. ...

Half-Life Crisis: Why AI Agents Fade with Time (and What It Means for Automation) “The longer the task, the harder they fall.” In the world of automation, we often focus on how capable AI agents are — but rarely on how long they can sustain that capability. A new paper by Toby Ord, drawing from the empirical work of Kwa et al. (2025), introduces a profound insight: AI agents have a “half-life” — a predictable drop-off in success as task duration increases. Like radioactive decay, it follows an exponential curve. ...

Traditionally, solving optimization problems involves meticulous human effort: crafting mathematical models, selecting appropriate algorithms, and painstakingly tuning hyperparameters. Despite the rigor, these human-centric processes are prone to bottlenecks, limiting the industrial adoption of cutting-edge optimization techniques. Wenhao Li and colleagues 1 challenge this paradigm in their recent paper, proposing an innovative shift toward evolutionary agentic workflows, powered by foundation models (FMs) and evolutionary algorithms. Understanding the Optimization Space Optimization problems typically traverse four interconnected spaces: ...

Generative AI is often praised for its creativity—composing symphonies, painting surreal scenes, or offering quirky new business ideas. But in some contexts, especially research and data processing, consistency and accuracy are far more valuable than imagination. A recent exploratory study by Utrecht University demonstrates exactly where Large Language Models (LLMs) like Claude 3 Opus shine—not as muses, but as meticulous clerks. When AI Becomes the Analyst The research project explores three different use cases in which generative AI was employed to perform highly structured research data tasks: ...

Introduction In recent years, Transformer models have redefined the field of artificial intelligence—especially in natural language processing (NLP). But their influence now stretches far beyond just language. From asset forecasting to automating enterprise tasks, Transformer architectures are laying the groundwork for a new generation of intelligent, cost-effective, and reliable SaaS platforms—especially for small businesses. This article explores: The core differences between Transformer models and traditional machine learning approaches. How Transformers are being used outside of NLP, such as in finance and quantitative trading. Most importantly, how Transformer-based models can power next-gen SaaS tailored for small firms. Transformer vs. Traditional Models: A Paradigm Shift Traditional machine learning models—such as logistic regression, decision trees, and even RNNs (Recurrent Neural Networks)—typically process data in a fixed, sequential manner. These models struggle with long-term dependencies, require hand-engineered features, and don’t generalize well across different tasks without significant tuning. ...