The Goats in the Machine: Why AI Agents Need Contracts, Not Personalities
A practical reading of two new agent papers showing why enterprise AI should be judged by observable behaviour and runtime contracts, not human-like performance theatre.
A practical reading of two new agent papers showing why enterprise AI should be judged by observable behaviour and runtime contracts, not human-like performance theatre.
A mechanism-first reading of a factorial molecular GNN benchmark showing why message construction deserves more attention than architectural nameplates.
A small trajectory encoder nearly matches a frontier LLM judge on reward-hack detection, but only when it can read the reasoning-rich trace.
A practical reading of two arXiv papers showing why AI works best in high-stakes evaluation when it is anchored to human evidence and audited for real engagement.
A mechanism-first reading of AI-Paper-Review shows why AI review is useful as a pre-submission quality gate, not as a substitute for human peer review.
A business-focused reading of three arXiv papers showing why scalable AI depends on decomposing structure, uncertainty, and supervision before optimisation.
A practical reading of two arXiv papers showing why AI reliability depends on the states models visit and the trajectories evaluators inspect.
NICE shows why aggregate social-intelligence scores can hide the communication failures that matter most in real deployments.
A large K-12 writing study shows that LLM feedback works best as a teacher-mediated workflow, not as a replacement chatbot with better grammar.
A cross-domain look at why useful AI systems need adaptation layers that translate models, protocols, and rankings into the realities they are meant to serve.