Uncertainty

Opening — Why this matters now LLM agents today are voracious readers and remarkably poor conversationalists in the epistemic sense. They browse, retrieve, summarize, and reason—yet almost never talk back to the knowledge ecosystem they depend on. This paper names the cost of that silence with refreshing precision: epistemic asymmetry. Agents consume knowledge, but do not reciprocate, verify, or negotiate truth with the world. ...

Opening — Why this matters now Modern systems act faster than their understanding. Algorithms trade in microseconds, clinical protocols scale across populations, and institutions make irreversible decisions under partial information. Yet our ethical vocabulary remains binary: act or abstain, know or don’t know, responsible or not. That binary is failing. The paper behind this article introduces a deceptively simple idea with uncomfortable implications: uncertainty does not reduce moral responsibility — it reallocates it. When confidence falls, duty does not disappear. It migrates. ...

The most radical idea in Michael I. Jordan’s latest manifesto isn’t a new model, a benchmark, or even a novel training scheme. It’s a reorientation. He argues that we’ve misdiagnosed the nature of intelligence—and in doing so, we’ve built AI systems that are cognitively brilliant yet socially blind. The cure? Embrace a collectivist, economic lens. This is not techno-utopianism. Jordan—a towering figure in machine learning—offers a pointed critique of both the AGI hype and the narrow symbolic legacy of classical AI. The goal shouldn’t be to build machines that imitate lone geniuses. It should be to construct intelligent collectives—systems that are social, uncertain, decentralized, and deeply intertwined with human incentives. In short: AI needs an economic imagination. ...