<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Requirements Engineering on Cognaptus</title>
    <link>https://cognaptus.com/tags/requirements-engineering/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Requirements Engineering on Cognaptus</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.145.0</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://cognaptus.com/tags/requirements-engineering/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>CQ or Consequences: What This LLM Benchmark Reveals About AI Requirements Work</title>
      <link>https://cognaptus.com/blog/2026-04-22-cq-or-consequences-what-this-llm-benchmark-reveals-about-ai-requirements-work/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://cognaptus.com/blog/2026-04-22-cq-or-consequences-what-this-llm-benchmark-reveals-about-ai-requirements-work/</guid>
      <description>A comparison-based reading of CompCQ shows why LLM-generated requirements work needs model portfolios, not one-model faith.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CQ, AI &amp; The Question of Questions</title>
      <link>https://cognaptus.com/blog/2026-04-22-cq-ai-the-question-of-questions/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://cognaptus.com/blog/2026-04-22-cq-ai-the-question-of-questions/</guid>
      <description>A controlled comparison of human, template, and LLM-generated competency questions shows why AI can accelerate requirements elicitation without replacing expert judgment.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
