Regulation

Opening — Why this matters now Robot brains are finally getting interesting. Not because they’re bigger—though Pelican-VL’s 72B parameters certainly don’t hurt—but because researchers are starting to realize something embarrassingly human: skill doesn’t come from data volume; it comes from correcting your own mistakes. In other words, practice, not just pretraining. And if embodied AI is going to leave the simulation lab and actually manipulate the physical world, we need smarter practice loops, not larger datasets. ...

The Latent Truth: Why Prototype Explanations Need a Reality Check Opening — Why this matters now Prototype-based neural networks have enjoyed a comfortable reputation in the XAI world: interpretable by design, or so the pitch goes. Their tidy habit of pointing at learned prototypes—“this looks like that”—has made them poster children for explainability. But 2025’s regulatory mood is unforgiving. In safety‑critical domains, interpretability must mean guarantees, not vibes. A model that gestures vaguely at a prototype while internally depending on dozens of unacknowledged signals is not interpretable. It is merely polite. ...

Opening — Why this matters now Healthcare is allergic to overconfidence. Yet today’s clinical large language models (LLMs) routinely deliver it in spades—issuing crisp diagnostic statements even when the evidence reads more like a shrug. In a moment when health systems are experimenting with autonomous triage, automated interpretations, and AI clinical scribes, the cost of misplaced certainty is not theoretical; it is systemic. ...

Opening — Why this matters now Foreign exchange markets have always enjoyed a certain illusion of efficiency: trillions in daily volume, institutional dominance, and a near‑mythical reputation for being unforecastable. And yet, as systematic trading quietly absorbs more niches of discretionary decision‑making, one question keeps resurfacing: Is Forex genuinely uncrackable, or have we simply been looking with the wrong instruments? ...

Opening — Why this matters now AI research agents are having a moment. With every new benchmark topped and every fresh claim of “autonomous scientific discovery,” it’s becoming harder to tell which systems are genuinely improving and which are just getting better at polishing the same old tricks. As enterprises rush to build internal research agents—often with more ambition than design discipline—the question emerges: what actually separates a good AI research agent from a mediocre one? ...

Why This Matters Now The AI world is becoming increasingly obsessed with agents—agents that play games, navigate the web, answer your emails, and (occasionally) run your crypto portfolio into the ground. But while their language skills are flourishing, their physical intuition remains… juvenile. A model may eloquently describe the parabola of a projectile while simultaneously walking a digital avatar straight into lava. ...

Opening — Why this matters now The AI world has developed a habit: we benchmark agents on clean, curated, bite-sized tasks and then act surprised when these same agents flounder in environments that look even mildly like reality. The gap between performance on isolated RL benchmarks and the messy, interconnected complexity of the real world is becoming too obvious to ignore. ...

Opening — Why this matters now DeFi is no longer the experimental playground it was in 2020. It is an always-on, adversarial, liquidity-saturated environment where billions move across autonomous code. Yet beneath this supposed transparency lies a human opacity problem: we still don’t know why people perform the transactions they do. The chain is public; the intent is not. ...

Opening — Why this matters now Artificial intelligence is no longer content with taking your job; it now wants to publish in your favorite journal. If 2024 was the year enterprises raced to bolt LLMs onto every workflow, 2025 is the year science itself became an experiment — with AI as both the subject and the researcher. ...

Opening — Why this matters now The AI ecosystem is shifting from clever parrots to agents that can sustain long‑horizon workflows. Yet even the flashiest models stumble on the simplest human expectation: remembering what happened five minutes ago. Statelessness remains the enemy of reliability. Memory-R1 — introduced in a recent paper from LMU Munich and collaborators — pushes back against this brittleness. Instead of stuffing longer prompts or bolting on static RAG pipelines, it proposes something far more interesting: reinforcement-trained memory management. Think of it as teaching a model not just to recall, but to care about what it chooses to remember. ...