Neuro-Symbolic AI

Opening — Why this matters now Neuro‑symbolic AI is having a quiet comeback. While large language models dominate headlines, the systems quietly outperforming them on math proofs, logical deduction, and safety‑critical reasoning all share the same uncomfortable truth: reasoning is slow. Not neural inference—reasoning. The paper behind REASON makes an unfashionable but crucial claim: if we want agentic AI that reasons reliably, interprets decisions, and operates in real time, we cannot keep pretending GPUs are good at symbolic and probabilistic logic. They aren’t. REASON is what happens when researchers finally stop forcing logic to cosplay as linear algebra. ...

Opening — Why this matters now Large Language Models are excellent improvisers. Unfortunately, software systems—especially those embedding logic, constraints, and guarantees—are not jazz clubs. They are factories. And factories care less about eloquence than about whether the machine does what it is supposed to do. Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) systems promise something enterprises quietly crave: models that reason, obey constraints, and fail predictably. Yet in practice, NeSy frameworks remain the domain of specialists fluent in obscure DSLs and brittle APIs. The result is familiar: powerful theory, low adoption. ...