Machine Ethics

Opening — Why this matters now Agentic AI has officially entered its awkward adolescence. It can plan, call tools, collaborate, and occasionally impress investors—but it also hallucinates, forgets, loops endlessly, and collapses under modest real‑world complexity. The problem is no longer model capability. It’s architecture. Today’s agent systems are mostly stitched together through intuition, blog wisdom, and prompt folklore. Powerful, yes—but brittle. What’s missing is not another clever prompt trick, but an engineering discipline. ...

Opening — Why this matters now Temporal reasoning has always been the Achilles’ heel of symbolic AI. The moment time becomes quantitative—minutes, deadlines, durations—logic programs tend to balloon, grounders panic, and scalability quietly exits the room. This paper lands squarely in that discomfort zone and does something refreshingly unglamorous: it makes time boring again. And boring, in this case, is good for business. ...

Opening — Why this matters now LLM agents are no longer toys. They book flights, write emails, control vehicles, and increasingly operate in environments where getting it mostly right is not good enough. In real-world deployments, the failure mode that matters most is not ignorance—it is false confidence. Agents act when they should hesitate, fabricate when they should refuse, and choose when they should ask. ...

Opening — Why this matters now Audio-first interfaces are everywhere. Voice assistants, call-center bots, in-car copilots, and accessibility tools all rely on large audio-language models (LALMs) that promise to hear and think at the same time. Yet in practice, something awkward happens: the same model that reasons fluently when reading text suddenly becomes hesitant, shallow, or just wrong when listening to speech. ...

Opening — Why this matters now Educational AI has entered its prompt era. Models are powerful, APIs are cheap, and everyone—from edtech startups to university labs—is tweaking prompts like seasoning soup. The problem? Most of this tweaking is still artisanal. Intuition-heavy. Barely documented. And almost never evaluated with the same rigor we expect from the learning science it claims to support. ...

Opening — Why this matters now Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (FIMI) has quietly evolved from a niche security concern into a persistent, high‑tempo operational problem. Social media platforms now host influence campaigns that are faster, cheaper, and increasingly AI‑augmented. Meanwhile, defenders are expected to produce timely, explainable, and interoperable assessments—often across national and institutional boundaries. ...

Opening — Why this matters now AI discourse is increasingly stuck in a sterile debate: how smart are large models, really? The paper you just uploaded cuts through that noise with a sharper question—what even counts as intelligence? At a time when transformers simulate reasoning, cells coordinate without brains, and agents act across virtual worlds, clinging to neuron‑centric or task‑centric definitions of intelligence is no longer just outdated—it is operationally misleading. ...

Opening — Why this matters now Retrieval-Augmented Generation has reached an awkward adolescence. Vector search is fast, scalable, and confidently wrong when questions require structure, multi-hop reasoning, or global context. GraphRAG promised salvation by injecting topology into retrieval — and promptly ran into its own identity crisis: global search is thorough but slow, local search is precise but blind, and most systems oscillate between the two without ever resolving the tension. ...

Opening — Why this matters now Public-sector AI has a credibility problem. Not because it cannot optimize—but because it optimizes too cleanly. In health system planning, decisions are rarely about pure efficiency. They are negotiated compromises shaped by terrain, politics, institutional memory, and hard-earned intuition. Classic optimization methods politely ignore all that. This paper tackles a question many planners quietly ask but rarely formalize: Can we let algorithms optimize without silencing human judgment—and still keep mathematical guarantees intact? ...

Opening — Why this matters now The AI industry has developed an unhealthy obsession with thinking longer. More tokens, deeper chains, bigger context windows—surely that must mean better reasoning. Except, increasingly, it doesn’t. Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often reason past the point of usefulness, slipping into self-validation loops or overwriting correct answers with unnecessary exploration. This paper proposes a heretical idea in the age of scaling: maybe the model doesn’t need to think more—it needs to know when to stop. ...