Reasoning in Stereo: Why Vision-Language Models Need Multi‑Hop Sanity Checks
Opening — Why this matters now Vision‑Language Models (VLMs) have become the tech industry’s favorite multitool: caption your images, summarize your photos, and even generate vacation itineraries based on your cat pictures. But beneath the glossy demos lies an inconvenient truth: VLMs make factual mistakes with the confidence of a seasoned politician. In a world where AI is rapidly becoming an authoritative interface to digital content and physical reality, factual errors in multimodal systems are no longer cute glitches — they’re governance problems. When your model misidentifies a landmark, misattributes cultural heritage, or invents entities out of pixel dust, you don’t just lose accuracy; you lose trust. ...