Chain-of-Thought

Imagine debugging a black box. Now imagine that black box occasionally narrates its thoughts aloud. That’s the opportunity—and the fragility—presented by Chain-of-Thought (CoT) monitoring, a newly emergent safety paradigm for large language models (LLMs). In their recent landmark paper, Korbak et al. argue that reasoning traces generated by LLMs—especially those trained for explicit multi-step planning—offer a fleeting yet powerful handle on model alignment. But this visibility, they warn, is contingent, brittle, and already under threat. ...

A persistent mystery in the recent surge of reasoning-augmented LLMs—like OpenAI’s o1 or DeepSeek-R1—is whether these models learn to reason through post hoc reinforcement fine-tuning, or if they were already good at it to begin with. ASTRO offers a rare counter-example: a method that imbues non-reasoner LLMs (like vanilla Llama 3) with structured reasoning behavior from scratch. Rather than rely on emergent capabilities or distillation from models that already search well, ASTRO teaches LLMs to think like search algorithms themselves, using a hybrid approach combining Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), procedure cloning, chain-of-thought generation, and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards. ...

In the world of large language models (LLMs), answers often emerge from an intricate internal dialogue. But what if we could locate the few sentences within that stream of thoughts that disproportionately steer the outcome—like anchors stabilizing a drifting ship? That’s exactly what Paul Bogdan, Uzay Macar, Neel Nanda, and Arthur Conmy aim to do in their new work, “Thought Anchors: Which LLM Reasoning Steps Matter?”. This study presents an ambitious trifecta of methods to trace the true influencers of LLM reasoning. ...

The Chain-of-Thought (CoT) paradigm has become a cornerstone in improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). But as CoT matures, one question looms larger: Does every problem really need an elaborate chain? In this article, we dive into a new method called AdaR1, which rethinks the CoT strategy by asking not only how to reason—but how much. ...

When large language models (LLMs) learned to think step-by-step, the world took notice. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning breathed new life into multi-step arithmetic, logic, and even moral decision-making. But as multimodal AI evolved, researchers tried to bring this paradigm into the visual world — by editing images step-by-step instead of all at once. And it failed. In the recent benchmark study Complex-Edit: CoT-Like Instruction Generation for Complexity-Controllable Image Editing Benchmark1, the authors show that CoT-style image editing — what they call sequential editing — not only fails to improve results, but often worsens them. Compared to applying a single, complex instruction all at once, breaking it into sub-instructions causes notable drops in instruction-following, identity preservation, and perceptual quality. ...

Cut the Fluff: Leaner AI Thinking When it comes to large language models (LLMs), brains aren’t the only thing growing—so are their waistlines. As AI systems become increasingly powerful in their ability to reason, a hidden cost emerges: token bloat, high latency, and ballooning energy consumption. One of the most well-known methods for boosting LLM intelligence is Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. CoT enables models to break down complex problems into a step-by-step sequence—much like how humans tackle math problems by writing out intermediate steps. This structured thinking approach, famously adopted by models like OpenAI’s o1 and DeepSeek-R1 (source), has proven to dramatically increase both performance and transparency. ...

Introduction In the race to develop increasingly powerful AI agents, it is tempting to believe that size and scale alone will determine success. OpenAI’s GPT, Anthropic’s Claude, and Google’s Gemini are all remarkable examples of cutting-edge large language models (LLMs) capable of handling complex, end-to-end tasks. But behind the marvel lies a critical commercial reality: these models are not free. For enterprise applications, the cost of inference can become a serious bottleneck. As firms aim to deploy AI across workflows, queries, and business logic, every API call adds up. This is where a more deliberate, resourceful approach can offer not just a competitive edge—but a sustainable business model. ...

An open-source reasoning model achieving state-of-the-art performance in math, code, and logic tasks.