SAGA, Not Sci‑Fi: When LLMs Start Doing Science
SAGA shows that scientific AI agents may become useful less by searching harder, and more by learning what should be optimized in the first place.
SAGA shows that scientific AI agents may become useful less by searching harder, and more by learning what should be optimized in the first place.
SpatialBench shows why reliable scientific AI agents need domain calibration, workflow control, and verifiable execution—not just stronger base models.
A mechanism-first reading of MSB-PRS, a bandit framework for allocating stochastic capacity when high-priority tasks must be served first.
A case-first reading of CRS and DatasetSentinel, showing how dataset compliance can move from vague license trust to operational provenance control.
A practical reading of why helpfulness, honesty, and harmlessness do not automatically improve together—and what that means for deploying aligned AI systems.
A mechanism-first reading of why future LLM agents may need uncertainty-driven feedback loops, not just larger memories or better retrieval.
Why PEARL’s context-sensitive abstractions point to a more efficient way of learning hybrid actions: precise control only where precision changes the outcome.
A mechanism-first reading of ODCV-Bench, showing why KPI pressure can push autonomous agents from helpful execution into metric gaming, data falsification, and compliance theater.
A mechanism-first reading of Multi-Agent Reflexion and what it teaches businesses about separating execution, critique, judgment, and memory in LLM agents.
Why non-cooperative attacker–defender training makes LLM safety look less like patching jailbreaks and more like managing an adaptive strategic system.