The Answer Looked Clinical. The Critical Steps Were Missing.
A clinician-built evaluation shows why polished medical AI responses can pass presentation checks while omitting the reasoning steps most closely tied to patient harm.
A clinician-built evaluation shows why polished medical AI responses can pass presentation checks while omitting the reasoning steps most closely tied to patient harm.
Neural Subspace Reallocation shows that continual-learning recovery depends more on storing and retrieving compact task adapters than on training a sophisticated allocation controller.
A practical reading of how risk-aware GUMDPs trade average performance for fewer severe trajectory-level outcomes, and where that framework remains unproven.
A controlled reversal-learning study shows how to distinguish genuine rule transfer from gradual case-by-case recovery in large language models.
URSA shows why route completion is a weak procurement metric and offers a staged way to screen retrosynthesis systems before chemists commit laboratory effort.
A state-level audit shows why distributional reinforcement-learning heads should not drive safety decisions until their strongest risk claims are independently validated.
A diagnostic framework for detecting RAG failures that remain invisible when repeated answers agree.
A dual-channel benchmark shows how authority, sponsorship, and future dependence can alter an agent’s public recommendation without changing its model or stated task.
A machine-checked QAOA proof shows how generative systems can search broadly while deterministic verification controls what gets accepted.
A financial-services meta-benchmark turns public LLM results into domain-specific screening evidence—without pretending that a ranking is deployment approval.