Atom by Atom, Better Research: How Fine-Grained Rewards Make Agentic Search Smarter
Atom-Searcher shows why research agents may need rewards for intermediate research behaviour, not just final-answer correctness.
Atom-Searcher shows why research agents may need rewards for intermediate research behaviour, not just final-answer correctness.
FutureX shows that forecasting agents should be judged as live operating systems, not static models with better vibes.
TL;DR for operators A deletion request is not a prompt. It is not a “please forget” instruction, a fine-tuning vibe, or a compliance-flavoured model apology. The useful idea in Unlearning at Scale: Implementing the Right to be Forgotten in Large Language Models is much less mystical: make training reproducible enough that deletion can be executed like systems recovery.1 The paper treats training as a deterministic program, logs the minimal control inputs needed to replay that program, and then removes the requested data during replay. Under strict preconditions, the resulting parameters are bit-identical, in the training dtype, to the model that would have been produced if the forgotten examples had never been included. ...
AMAeval shows why moral AI evaluation should test how models derive situation-specific rules from values, not merely whether they reach acceptable verdicts.
A practical reading of what Sugarscape-style survival experiments reveal about LLM agents, task reliability, and operational control.
A comparison-based reading of agentic AI frameworks that turns protocol, memory, guardrail, and service-computing differences into practical architecture choices.
AIM-Bench shows that LLM inventory agents do not fail like generic chatbots; they fail like operational decision-makers with measurable biases.
A search-based privacy red-teaming framework shows how agent-agent attacks evolve from blunt requests into forged consent and impersonation—and why static privacy prompts are not enough.
CryptoScope shows how retrieval-grounded LLM workflows can turn cryptographic code review from pattern matching into structured, spec-aware vulnerability triage.
A clinical NLI benchmark shows that LLMs can recall the right medical facts while failing to apply them in structured reasoning.