Seeing Too Much: When Multimodal Models Forget Privacy
A mechanism-first reading of PII-VisBench, showing why privacy risk in vision-language models depends on who is visible, what is asked, and how the model has learned to recognize people.
A mechanism-first reading of PII-VisBench, showing why privacy risk in vision-language models depends on who is visible, what is asked, and how the model has learned to recognize people.
A mechanism-first reading of Hierarchical Speculative Decoding, a lossless verifier that improves LLM inference speed by accepting more draft tokens without changing the target distribution.
A mechanism-first reading of STACKPLANNER, showing why long-horizon agent systems may need memory control more than bigger context windows.
TowerMind shows why valid actions are not enough: LLM agents can follow rules, waste resources, and still fail at dynamic planning.
DynaDebate shows that multi-agent reasoning improves not by adding more voices, but by engineering disagreement, step-level critique, and conditional verification.
A mechanism-first reading of Ambi3D and AmbiVer, showing why safe embodied AI needs an ambiguity gate before execution.
AgentDevel shows why improving LLM agents may require release gates, traces, and regression control more than another round of self-reflection.
A mechanism-first reading of why phishing defense needs calibrated confidence and cue-level reasoning, not just another classifier with a larger vocabulary.
A mechanism-first reading of ResMAS, showing why resilient LLM agent systems depend on communication topology and topology-aware prompts, not just more agents.
TAPE shows why reinforcement learning agents can fail when the interface stays familiar but the hidden rules of the world change.